You are not logged in.

Barriers to adoption of ‘no-cost’ mitigation options

Details

Tender Closed
RFx ID : 10095775
Tender Name : Barriers to adoption of ‘no-cost’ mitigation options
Reference # : RFP17526
Open Date : Thursday, 19 March 2015 12:00 PM (Pacific/Auckland UTC+13:00)
Close Date  : Thursday, 16 April 2015 2:00 PM (Pacific/Auckland UTC+12:00)
Tender Type : Request for Proposals (RFP)
Tender Coverage : On behalf of procurement agent  [?]
Categories :
  • 70121600 - Livestock industry
  • 77101500 - Environmental impact assessment
  • 81171800 - Agricultural science services
Regions:
  • International
Exemption Reason : None
Required Pre-qualifications : None
Contact : Kate Parlane
kate.parlane@nzagrc.org.nz
06 351 8305
Alternate Physical Delivery Address  : NZAGRC, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North 4442, Attention: Project Analyst
Alternate Physical Fax Number  :
Agency Address :
Overview

MPI seeks to procure a research project to support and extend the work of the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases, specifically its Livestock Research Group.

The project title is: “Barriers to adoption of ‘no-cost’ mitigation options“.

The scientific literature identifies a range of options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from livestock agriculture that should present no costs to farmers or even generate economic benefits. However, many of those apparent “no-cost options” remain un- oder under-adopted in practice. This indicates hidden costs and/or the presence of other barriers that reduce adoption of such options.

This project would seek to better understand the reasons why under-adoption of apparent no-cost options is occurring and, if options are confirmed as truly no-cost, identify mechanisms to increase the adoption of both currently existing and potential future no-cost mitigation options.

The expected outcomes at the end of the research programme are: improved understanding why some mitigation options that the scientific literature identifies as ‘no-cost’ (and often as economically beneficial) to farmers remain un- or under-adopted in practice, a more realistic assessment of mitigation potentials derived from marginal abatement cost curves, and indications for policy of how adoption of such options could be increased.

RFx Outcome

No Winner Tender process run by AgResearch