Create New Account Purchaser Login
Search Tenders
Search
Advanced Search
You are not logged in.

RFP - Organisational Design Tool

This tender is using the new split file responses feature on GETS. The agency has indicated that they would like to receive responses separated by price and non price components, please keep this mind when preparing your response for submission via GETS.

Details

RFx ID : 24120523
Tender Name : RFP - Organisational Design Tool
Reference # : MOE10906
Open Date : Tuesday, 23 March 2021 4:00 PM (Pacific/Auckland UTC+13:00)
Close Date  : Wednesday, 21 April 2021 12:00 PM (Pacific/Auckland UTC+12:00)
Department/Business Unit : Corporate and Governance
Tender Type : Request for Proposals (RFP)
Tender Coverage : Sole Agency  [?]
Categories :
  • 43000000 - Information Technology Broadcasting and Telecommunications
Regions:
  • Wellington
Exemption Reason : None
Required Pre-qualifications : None
Contact : Rochelle Wallens
moe.procurement@education.govt.nz
Alternate Physical Delivery Address  :
Alternate Physical Fax Number  :
Overview

This RFP relates to the purchase of an organisation structural design tool which can utilise our workforce data to provide our leaders with structural design options and their costings. The key outcomes that the Ministry want to achieve are to be able to:
• Have this tool available as part of the Ministry’s human resource suite of software and systems so that the tool can complement our legacy systems.
• See organisation structural options at an individual, team, business group, regional and national level
• See organisational structural options and their distribution through other lenses such as gender, ethnicity, seniority, job type and salary band
• Change option’s levels and boundaries of teams, business groups and regions quickly to see the immediate impact on the structure
• See what happens with each change on the costing at different levels
• Save structural options for future reference
• Update options when new workforce data is uploaded
• Present options to leaders either electronically or in a printable form with an option to highlight where the main differences are for easy comparison
• Implementation of the solution
• Arrange suitable support for maintenance, upgrades, and training of the tool.